The English and Communication Benchmarks, Grades 4 – 12 are based on the ADP end-of-high school benchmarks and are organized into the following strands:
| In grades 4 – 5, students are introduced to text with appropriate Text Complexity (T) and have three ways to |
|
Whether they Work in Teams (W) or individually, students have three ways to
Communicate Information (C) |
| For future success in postsecondary education and work, students in grades 4 – 5 will need to |
|
In grades 4 – 5, students are introduced to text with appropriate Text Complexity (T) and have three ways to
READING (A.1) As students progress across the grade levels, they should comprehend increasingly complex texts. To do so, they need to acquire increasingly sophisticated reading skills. A note on how to UNDERSTAND TEXT COMPLEXITY (T) at grades 4 – 5 In grades 4 – 5, students should read a wide variety of fiction and nonfiction independently. Texts of varied levels of difficulty may be included in grades 4 – 5 in order to develop specific reading skills or target certain content or themes. To select texts of appropriate complexity, educators should consider such factors as topic or theme, development of ideas, connections among ideas, organizational structures, style, vocabulary, students' familiarity with the setting or context, and the author’s purpose. (See the Text Complexity scales for informational, persuasive and literary texts for more information on some of the criteria that influence text complexity.) Educators should also bear in mind that students interested in a topic may do well with texts that may otherwise be above their reading level. To illustrate the complexity of texts expected at the grades 4 – 5 level, the benchmarks include examples of the level of texts students should read. For more information on selecting texts, please click here. In some cases, reading skills change as students progress across grade levels. For instance, students identify facts and opinions at early grades and then distinguish between stated evidence and implied inferences at later grades. In other cases, the general skill remains the same (such as identifying a main idea and supporting details) but the complexity of the text increases, increasing the difficulty of the task for students. The benchmarks below address reading skills that students will practice across the disciplines, but it is important to note that, as research has verified, the specific set of sub-skills that students use may vary according to the discipline; students read literary texts differently from biology texts, for example, in terms of their attention to detail and to larger relationships among ideas. (NOTE: This document does not detail the requirements of successful discipline-specific reading skills and strategies. One potential resource for information regarding subject-specific reading skills is the International Reading Association document on Standards for Middle and High School Literacy Coaches (pdf). This document discusses the skill sets coaches need to help teachers develop, and in doing so may help to highlight possible differences between disciplines.) The reading skills that students use may vary depending on the type of text they read. Some skills, such as understanding unfamiliar vocabulary words, cut across all text types. Other skills are specific to the types of texts, such as evaluating the relevance of evidence in an argument. Because of the various contextual demands, reading skills are grouped around four organizers (NOTE: The ACT College Readiness Standards for Reading, the College Board Standards for College Success, the draft 2009 National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) Reading Framework (pdf), the Core Knowledge Sequence, the District of Columbia Reading/English Language Arts Pre-K through Grade 12 Standards and the Indiana (pdf) and Massachusetts (pdf) reading lists were used as sources in the development of these benchmarks.): A.1.1 Using Vocabulary Skills
A.1.1.2 using context A.1.2 Analyzing Informational Texts
A.1.2.2 synthesizing information A.1.2.3 analyzing information A.1.2.4 following directions A.1.3 Analyzing Arguments Using Logic / Critical Thinking
A.1.3.2 analyzing evidence A.1.3.3 connecting and contrasting Ideas A.1.4 Analyzing Literary Texts
A.1.4.2 analyzing narrative elements A.1.4.3 analyzing genre characteristics A.1.4.4 analyzing texts These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. A.1.1 Reading: Using Vocabulary Skills
A.1.1.1.4-5.b Identify the meaning of common prefixes (e.g., un- or re-) and common suffixes (e.g., -ful). (ADP A3) A.1.1.1.4-5.c Determine the meaning of words and their connections to word families using knowledge of common roots, suffixes and prefixes. (ADP A3) A.1.1.2.4-5.a Use surrounding textual context (e.g., in-sentence definitions), cues (e.g., commas, quotes) and graphic cues (bold face) to determine the meaning of unfamiliar words or distinguish among multiple-meaning words in relatively uncomplicated texts about concrete topics. For example, "The 'dromedary,' commonly called a camel, stores fat in its hump." (ADP A4) A.1.1.2.4-5.b Use prior reading knowledge and explicit study to recognize common allusions. For example, recognize the allusion when referring to a lucky person as having the "Midas" touch. (ADP A5) A.1.1.2.4-5.c Demonstrate understanding of common phrases and proverbs. For example, demonstrate understanding of "blow hot and cold" or "don’t count your chickens before they are hatched." (ADP A5)
A.1.1.2.4-5.d Determine the appropriate meaning of figurative words and phrases (including metaphors and similes) in relatively uncomplicated passages. For example, determine the meaning of "He was as cold as ice" or "It is raining cats and dogs." (ADP A5) A.1.2 Reading: Analyzing Informational TextsNOTE: Click to access the Indiana Reading List (pdf) and the Massachusetts Reading List (pdf) to see examples of informational texts and authors by grade bands. Click here to view a discussion of Text Complexity, including a scale for increasing complexity of informational texts. View Text Complexity strand for related content.
A.1.2.1.4-5.b Identify the main idea of relatively uncomplicated informational text, in which the main idea may be explicitly stated. For example, read David Schwartz’s How Much Is a Million and explain the central concept the author is trying to convey. (ADP F2) A.1.2.1.4-5.c Identify the details that support the main idea of straightforward, relatively uncomplicated informational text. For example, read Russell Freedman’s The Wright Brothers: How They Invented the Airplane and explain how the Wright brothers created the first airplane. (ADP F2) A.1.2.1.4-5.d Recognize explicit relationships among ideas (e.g., cause-effect, additive, comparative, sequential) in straightforward, relatively uncomplicated informational texts. For example, read Patricia Lauber’s Volcano: the Eruption and Healing of Mount St. Helens and identify the process that caused the eruption and its aftermath. (ADP F6)
A.1.2.1.4-5.e Make simple inferences and draw basic conclusions. For example, read Etta Kaner’s Animal Defenses: How Animals Protect Themselves and draw conclusions about the defense mechanisms of various animals and the author’s intent in writing the text. (ADP F8) A.1.3 Reading: Analyzing Arguments Using Logic / Critical ThinkingNOTE: Click here to view a discussion of Text Complexity, including a scale for increasing complexity of persuasive texts.
Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. In this example, the premises are "All men are mortal" and "Socrates is a man," and the conclusion is "Therefore, Socrates is mortal," which is the inference deduced from the premises. (ADP E3)A.1.3.1.4-5.b Demonstrate understanding of causality (that the truth or occurrence of one thing can necessarily imply something else, e.g., "Because diamonds are the hardest rocks on the Earth, a drill made with a diamond tip will be harder than one made with steel.") and probability (that the truth or occurrence of one thing can make other things likely or unlikely, e.g., "My steel drill has never failed to cut through the Earth; it’s probably harder than other types of drill bits.") For example, find examples of deductive and inductive reasoning in a mystery such as an Encyclopedia Brown novel or Lois Lowry’s The One Hundredth Thing about Caroline. (ADP E7) A.1.3.2.4-5.a Identify different types of evidence used to support simple arguments. For example, identify evidence from direct experience, from authority of experts, from a text about the topic and repeating someone else’s experience. (ADP E4) A.1.3.2.4-5.b Identify the basic qualities of factual claims and opinions in simple statements. For example, read Cleopatra by Peter Vennema and identify the difference between factual claims about her and views that are biased. (ADP E1) A.1.3.2.4-5.c Identify the characteristics of simple false statements such as their contradictory nature. For example, read Judy Leimbach’s Primarily Logic and learn about logical contradictions. (ADP E2) A.1.3.2.4-5.d Identify simple faulty reasoning and basic propaganda techniques, including bandwagon, name-calling and celebrity testimonials. For example, read Sports Illustrated for Kids and identify techniques used in advertisements, such as using a star athlete to recommend a certain product or encouraging viewers to buy a product because everyone else does or because they will fit in if they do. (ADP E5) A.1.3.2.4-5.e Identify specific words and phrases used in written and oral communication to persuade (e.g., sarcasm, loaded terms). For example, use In Other Words: A Beginning Thesaurus to discover rhetorical differences in the meaning of words. (ADP E6) A.1.3.3.4-5.a Identify basic relationships among ideas (e.g., similarity, difference, causality) in an argument. For example, consider “If it is raining outside, the ground will be wet. It is raining outside. Therefore, the ground is wet.” (ADP F6) A.1.3.3.4-5.b Compare and contrast the viewpoints of two different authors writing about the same topic. For example, read Sacajawea by Joseph Bruchac and The Story of Sacajawea by Della Rowland and identify the different approaches both texts take in writing about her role on the Lewis and Clark Expedition. (ADP E8) A.1.4 Reading: Analyzing Literary Texts
A.1.4.1.4-5.b Analyze foundational documents that have historical and literary significance in American culture. For example, read letters between John and Abigail Adams, and the Preamble to the Constitution. (ADP H2) A.1.4.2.4-5.a Sequence and identify the plot’s main events, their causes and the influence of each event on future actions in relatively uncomplicated literary texts. For example, identify and sequence the main events in The Trumpet of the Swan by E.B. White. (ADP H4) A.1.4.2.4-5.b Identify and describe characters in uncomplicated literary texts. (ADP H4 and ADP H8) A.1.4.2.4-5.c Identify characters’ motivations and conflicts in relatively uncomplicated literary texts. For example, identify the characters’ motivations in Jean Merrill’s The Pushcart War. (ADP H4 and ADP H8) A.1.4.2.4-5.d Identify and describe the setting (location and time) in relatively uncomplicated literary texts. A.1.4.2.4-5.e Identify and describe the narration (first- or third-person narrative point of view) in relatively uncomplicated literary texts. (ADP H4)
A.1.4.3.4-5.a Distinguish among common forms of literature (poetry, prose, fiction, nonfiction, drama) using knowledge of their structural elements. (ADP H3)
A.1.4.3.4-5.c Identify the conventional elements of dramatic literature (e.g., scenes, acts, cast of characters, stage directions) in relatively uncomplicated plays that are read or viewed. (ADP H6) LISTENING (A.2) As students progress through the grade levels, they should use more attentive and sophisticated listening skills to comprehend complex oral communications. In addition to those skills explicitly stated below, students may be expected to apply the benchmarks for specific reading skills, from the Reading strand, to listening situations. The benchmarks for effective listening progresses across grades 4 – 5 in the following area: A.2.1 Listening Skills
A.2.1.2 identifying main idea and details A.2.1.3 summarizing A.2.1.4 paraphrasing A.2.1.5 analyzing A.2.1.6 working in teams These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. A.2.1 Listening Skills
A.2.1.2.4-5 Identify the thesis of a speech that is organized in a mostly linear pattern with a clear main idea which may be explicitly stated at the opening and identify ideas that support the main idea. For example, students may produce a story-telling video in which students perform or act out a story. (ADP B4) A.2.1.3.4-5 Summarize information presented orally by others in which the main idea and details are explicitly stated, including the purpose, main ideas and supporting details or evidence. (ADP B2) A.2.1.4.4-5 Paraphrase accurately relatively brief, uncomplicated ideas and information presented orally by others. (ADP B3) A.2.1.5.4-5 Identify purpose, style and organizational structure of a relatively uncomplicated speech. (ADP B5) A.2.1.6.4-5 Listen actively in group discussions by asking clarifying questions and by recognizing and managing external barriers (e.g., physical setting) to aid comprehension. (ADP B7) VIEWING (A.3) As students progress across the grade levels, they should view TV, film, the Internet, billboards, advertisements, newspapers and magazines in increasingly critical ways. Students should apply more attentive and analytical viewing skills to comprehend and evaluate complex media communications. In addition to those skills explicitly stated below, students may be expected to apply the benchmarks for specific reading skills, from the Reading strand, to viewing situations. The benchmarks for effective viewing progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following area: A.3.1 Viewing Skills
A.3.1.2 considering visual and verbal intersections A.3.1.3 analyzing visuals, sound and design These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. A.3.1 Viewing Skills
A.3.1.2.4-5 Identify traits of the visual arts (such as media images, painting, film and graphic arts) and verbal arts (words and text), and consider how visual and verbal elements work together to convey a message in relatively uncomplicated media. (ADP G2) A.3.1.3.4-5.a Identify visual and sound techniques and design elements (e.g., special effects, camera angles, lighting and music). (ADP G3) A.3.1.3.4-5.b Identify ways in which visual and sound techniques help to deliver an idea or message. (ADP G3) |
|
Whether they Work in Teams (W) or individually, students have three ways to
Communicate Information (C)
WRITING (C.1) As students progress through the grade levels, they should write a variety of texts and communicate ideas that are increasingly complex. They should also develop in their ability to make effective choices in their writing. These benchmarks are relevant for all types of writing and should be used along with the benchmarks for Informational/Explanatory Essays, Literary Analysis Essays, Argumentative Essays, Research Essays and Work-Related Texts. These benchmarks are also applicable to and should be used alongside the benchmarks for the other modes of communicating: Speaking and Producing Digital Media. A reference source that may be useful for teachers of writing is the Alliance for Excellent Education report, Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High School (pdf), by Steve Graham and Dolores Perin. It is worth noting that ADP does not specify personal or creative writing as a writing product necessary for workplace and college success. Expressing oneself in a personal way in writing, however, can be an important way to develop students’ writing and thinking and may support the more formal types of performances provided in these benchmarks. The benchmarks for effective writing progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: C.1.1 Topics, Development and Focus
C.1.1.2 developing sufficient and effective supporting details and examples C.1.1.3 focusing on purpose C.1.2 Coherence and Cohesion
C.1.2.2 using transitions which provide textual coherence and cohesion C.1.3 Language and Technical Facility
C.1.3.2 using complex syntax and varied sentence structures as appropriate for purpose C.1.3.3 developing an effective and varied style and tone C.1.3.4 demonstrating control of standard English through grammar and mechanics C.1.3.5 citing sources effectively and correctly C.1.4 Writing Process: Planning, Editing, Revising and Using Technology
C.1.4.2 editing for correctness C.1.4.3 revising for effectiveness C.1.4.4 utilizing different writing technologies NOTE: The ADP benchmarks emphasize measurable outcomes and products, as opposed to those parts of process which are less measurable, or those strategies students and teachers might use to achieve the measurable outcome, including some aspects of planning and pre-writing and certain aspects of drafting (such as strategies to develop ideas by consulting with peers). These are important to student success in writing, but the ADP focus is on measurable outcomes rather than instructional or learning processes. Drafting is addressed within the sections above on Topics, Development and Focus; Coherence and Cohesion; and Language and Technical Facility. These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. C.1.1 Writing: Topics, Development and Focus
C.1.1.2.4-5 Use specific facts, concrete details, reasons and examples that support the thesis or expand the topic. (ADP C4) C.1.2 Writing: Coherence and Cohesion
C.1.2.1.4-5.b Use appropriate words to indicate the organizational pattern (e.g., simple time order and listing ideas as “first,” “second,” “third” etc.). (ADP C3) C.1.2.1.4-5.c Use text features (headings, subheadings, formatting) as appropriate to support organizational structure. (ADP C3) C.1.2.2.4-5 Connect relatively uncomplicated ideas using relatively simple transitions. For example, show steps in the order they happen using words like 'first' or 'before' or in simple relationships such as the use of 'and' or 'but.' (ADP C3) C.1.3 Writing: Language and Technical Facility
C.1.3.1.4-5.b Use language to enhance effect, (e.g., strong verbs, effective images). (ADP A6, ADP A7 and ADP C2) C.1.3.2.4-5.a Use correct and complete sentence structures. (ADP A1) C.1.3.2.4-5.b Use appropriate syntax to present ideas (e.g., using simple introductory clauses and conjunctions for subordination and coordination). (ADP A1) C.1.3.3.4-5.a Use formal or informal language appropriate to topic, purpose and audience. (ADP C5) C.1.3.3.4-5.b Use language that conveys the writer’s attitude, as appropriate for purpose and audience. (ADP C5) C.1.3.4.4-5 Demonstrate control of Standard English through grammar, usage and mechanics (punctuation, capitalization and spelling) to support the clarity of expression in relatively uncomplicated text. For example, write primarily in complete sentences, use coordinating conjunctions appropriately, understand use of comma in a series. (ADP A1) C.1.3.5.4-5 When other sources are used or referenced (such as in research, informational essays or literary essays), students will: C.1.4 Writing Process: Planning, Editing, Revising and Using Technology
C.1.4.1.4-5.b List ideas to include in writing, and then order the ideas logically (e.g., simple time order or order of importance). (ADP C1) C.1.4.2.4-5 Edit relatively uncomplicated writing for errors in mechanics (punctuation, capitalization), spelling and grammar (e.g., complete sentences, subject-verb agreement). (ADP C5) C.1.4.3.4-5 Drawing on reader’s comments, revise papers to: C.1.4.4.4-5 Use relatively basic software programs (e.g., Word) for uncomplicated written drafts and products. (ADP C7 and ADP C8) SPEAKING (C.2) As students progress across the grade levels, they should voice increasingly complex ideas in increasingly sophisticated ways. The benchmarks for Writing are relevant to many aspects of oral presentations and should be considered along with this progression. The benchmarks for effective speaking progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: C.2.1 Development of Ideas
C.2.2 Coherence and Cohesion
C.2.2.2 logically grouping ideas C.2.2.3 including smooth transitions C.2.2.4 providing a coherent conclusion C.2.3 Rhetorical Devices
C.2.4 Speaking Facility
These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. C.2.1 Speaking: Development of Ideas
C.2.2 Speaking: Coherence and Cohesion
C.2.2.1.4-5.b Use a clear, simple organizational pattern (e.g., spatial, chronological, sequential). (ADP B6) C.2.2.2.4-5 Logically order ideas to provide a consistent focus on the topic. (ADP B6) C.2.2.3.4-5 Connect relatively uncomplicated ideas using simple transitions and clear pronoun referents. For example, use listing words, such as "first," or "second." (ADP B6) C.2.2.4.4-5 Provide a relatively simple conclusion that restates the focus of the presentation or overtly signals closure in some other way (e.g., by addressing the listener directly). (ADP B6) C.2.3 Speaking: Rhetorical Devices
C.2.4 Speaking Facility
PRODUCING DIGITAL MEDIA (C.3) As students progress across the grade levels, they should communicate increasingly complex ideas in increasingly sophisticated ways. ADP G4 suggests that students apply and adapt the principles of written composition to create coherent media productions. The benchmarks for Writing are relevant to many aspects of digital media production and should be considered along with these benchmarks. The benchmarks for effectively producing digital media progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: C.3.1 Topics, Development and Focus
C.3.1.2 focusing on audience, context and purpose C.3.2 Coherence and Cohesion C.3.3 Technical Facility and Control
These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. C.3.1 Producing Digital Media: Topics, Development and Focus
C.3.1.2.4-8.a Demonstrate audience awareness through choice of medium; images, words and sounds; and supporting ideas. NOTE: There is no single benchmark that relates to this benchmark, but the expectation crosses types of writing and the principles are referred to in: ADP C9, ADP C10 and ADP E9. C.3.1.2.4-8.b Anticipate potential audience reaction and consider actual audience reaction (e.g., being aware of verbal and nonverbal cues given by the audience during a presentation) to improve media productions. NOTE: There is no single benchmark that relates to this benchmark, but the expectation crosses types of writing and the principles are referred to in: ADP C9, ADP C10 and ADP E9. C.3.2 Producing Digital Media: Coherence and Cohesion
C.3.3 Producing Digital Media: Technical Facility and Control
|
For future success in postsecondary education and work, students in grades 4 – 5 will need to
P.2 Product 2: Literary Analysis Essay P.3 Product 3: Argumentative Essay P.4 Product 4: Research Essay P.5 Product 5: Work-Related Texts PRODUCT 1: INFORMATIONAL/EXPLANATORY ESSAY (P.1) As students progress across the grade levels, they should draft informational or explanatory essays on topics that are increasingly complex. The draft of the NAEP 2011 Writing Framework (doc) defines writing to explain as writing that is:
(NOTE: Achieve's English and Communication Benchmarks include separate strands for Research Essay and Work-Related Texts.) The Writing strand describes the development of general writing skills and abilities; please use these benchmarks in connection with those below. Also, please note that while the benchmarks below are specific to writing, students can also convey information via Speaking or Producing Digital Media. The benchmark criteria below can be modified accordingly. The benchmarks for an effective informational essay progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: P.1.1 Topics, Development and Focus
P.1.1.2 making valid inferences and conclusions P.1.1.3 providing relevant details and/or examples to develop the thesis P.1.2 Coherence and Cohesion
P.1.2.2 creating a sustained, effective organizing structure appropriate to purpose, audience and context, with an effective body P.1.2.3 creating a sustained, effective organizing structure appropriate to purpose, audience and context, with an effective conclusion These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. P.1.1 Informational/Explanatory Essay: Topics, Development and Focus
P.1.1.1.4-5.b Present a central idea that clearly identifies the topic and addresses the purpose of the writing. For example, "After you read these directions, you will be able to make a kite that you can fly yourself." (ADP C9) P.1.1.2.4-5 Make valid inferences and draw reasonable conclusions based on the evidence from uncomplicated informational and technical texts. (ADP C9 and ADP F4) P.1.1.3.4-5 Adequately communicate uncomplicated ideas, insights or theories through relevant facts, concrete details, quotations, statistics or other information in support of the controlling idea. (ADP C9 and ADP C4) P.1.2 Informational/Explanatory Essay: Coherence and Cohesion
P.1.2.2.4-5.a Present a body of textual evidence that supports the analysis or presentation of relatively uncomplicated information. (ADP C9 and ADP C3) P.1.2.2.4-5.b Connect relatively uncomplicated ideas using relatively simple transitions (e.g., as a result, because of). (ADP C9 and ADP C3) P.1.2.2.4-5.c Create an effective organizing structure based on relatively uncomplicated information (e.g., description, compare/contrast, cause-and-effect). (ADP C9 and ADP C3) P.1.2.3.4-5 Craft an appropriate conclusion that: PRODUCT 2: LITERARY ANALYSIS ESSAY (P.2) As students progress across the grade levels, they should draft literary analysis essays on topics and literary works that are increasingly complex. The Writing strand describes the development of general writing skills and abilities; please use these benchmarks in connection with those below. Also, please note that while the benchmarks below are specific to writing, students can also convey literary analyses via Speaking or Producing Digital Media; the benchmark criteria below can be modified accordingly. The Reading strand describes the progression of expectations for skills in reading; please see these benchmarks for additional information on reading literary texts, as much of the content of students’ literary analysis essays will be a demonstration of their achievement of these literary-text reading skills. The benchmarks for an effective literary analysis essay progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: P.2.1 Topics, Development and Focus
P.2.1.2 developing a thesis that reflects an interpretation, analysis or evaluation of some element(s) of the literary work(s) P.2.1.3 making inferences about the literature P.2.1.4 including text evidence (passages, lines or specific reference to content from the work(s)) that demonstrates a deep understanding of the work(s) and supports the thesis P.2.1.5 interpreting literature and using knowledge of genre to enhance the interpretation (when relevant to topic developed) P.2.1.6 demonstrating a knowledge of literary context and foundational works (when relevant to topic developed) P.2.2 Coherence and Cohesion
P.2.2.2 sustaining a logical organizing structure, with an effective body P.2.2.3 sustaining a logical organizing structure, with an effective conclusion These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. P.2.1 Literary Analysis Essay: Topics, Development and Focus
P.2.1.2.4-5 Present an essay with a central idea that summarizes and interprets some aspect of a relatively uncomplicated literary work. (ADP C9)
P.2.1.3.4-5 Make valid inferences based on material clearly described within a relatively uncomplicated literary work. For example, infer what can be learned about life in the Ozarks during the depression from Where the Red Fern Grows by Wilson Rawls; or infer what we can learn about pioneer life on the prairie from the Little House in the Big Woods series by Laura Ingalls Wilder. (ADP C9)
P.2.2 Literary Analysis Essay: Coherence and Cohesion
P.2.2.2.4-5.a Present a body of textual evidence that supports the central idea about a relatively uncomplicated literary work(s). (ADP C3) P.2.2.2.4-5.b Connect relatively uncomplicated ideas using relatively simple transitions. (ADP C3) P.2.2.3.4-5 Craft a conclusion in which closure is provided, such as a shift from specific information to a more general statement or claim regarding the work and/or the author. (ADP C3 and ADP C9) PRODUCT 3: ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY (P.3) As students progress across the grade levels, they should develop increasingly complex arguments. The Writing strand describes the development of general writing skills and abilities; please use these benchmarks in connection with those below. Also, please note that while the benchmarks below are specific to writing, students can also construct and convey arguments via Speaking or Producing Digital Media; the benchmark criteria below can be modified accordingly. The Reading strand describes the progression of expectations for skills in reading; please see these benchmarks for additional, specific information on reading arguments. Some aspects of students’ argumentative essays will demonstrate their level of skill in reading arguments. A student’s ability to analyze arguments for such things as quality of the evidence, logical fallacies and devices used to persuade will be reflected in their ability to construct sound arguments. The benchmarks for an effective argument progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: P.3.1 Topics, Development and Focus
P.3.1.2 defending the position or claim(s) with precise and relevant evidence P.3.1.3 evaluating connections between evidence, inference(s) and claim(s) P.3.1.4 using a range of strategies to elaborate and persuade P.3.2 Purpose and Audience
P.3.2.2 anticipating and refuting counterarguments based on audience and purpose P.3.3 Coherence and Cohesion
P.3.3.2 creating a sustained, strong organizing structure, with an effective body and with logical, clear transitions P.3.3.3 creating a sustained, strong organizing structure, with an effective conclusion These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. P.3.1 Argumentative Essay: Topics, Development and Focus
P.3.1.2.4-5.a Communicate relevant facts, concrete details, quotations, statistics or other information in support of a relatively uncomplicated argument. (ADP E9) P.3.1.2.4-5.b Avoid common propaganda techniques, such as bandwagon or name calling. For example, “Everyone does this, so you should too” or “Mr. X is a fool”). (ADP E9) P.3.1.3.4-5 Through simple, straightforward transitional language (e.g., for example), make connections between the supporting evidence and main claim. (ADP E3) P.3.1.4.4-5 Use some basic strategies, where appropriate (such as descriptions or personal anecdotes), to elaborate as well as to persuade the reader. (ADP E9) P.3.2 Argumentative Essay: Purpose and Audience
P.3.2.2.4-5 Anticipate the reader’s need for additional information and show awareness of opposing viewpoints. (ADP E9) P.3.3 Argumentative Essay: Coherence and Cohesion
P.3.3.2.4-5 Present a body of evidence that supports a relatively uncomplicated argument (a simple claim) with relevant evidence and connects uncomplicated ideas using simple transitions. (ADP C3) P.3.3.3.4-5 Craft a conclusion that competently restates a relatively simple thesis. (ADP E9) PRODUCT 4: RESEARCH ESSAY (P.4) As students progress across the grade levels, they should research and draft research essays on topics that are increasingly complex. The Writing strand describes the development of general writing skills and abilities; please use these benchmarks in connection with those below. Also, please note that while the benchmarks below are specific to writing, students can also convey research findings via Speaking or Producing Digital Media; the benchmark criteria below can be modified accordingly. The benchmarks for an effective research essay (or documented essay – NOTE: The expectation is that students will write extended documented essays, which may be original research but are not necessarily so. The term “research essay” is used because of its familiarity to the field and its use in ADP D5) progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: P.4.1 Topics, Development and Focus
P.4.1.2 identifying and evaluating sources for reliability, credibility, consistency and strength P.4.1.3 synthesizing information from a variety of sources P.4.1.4 marshaling evidence in support of a thesis or related claims P.4.1.5 paraphrasing and summarizing the range of arguments related to the thesis P.4.2 Coherence and Cohesion
P.4.2.2 sustaining a logical organizing structure, with an effective body P.4.2.3 sustaining a logical organizing structure, with an effective conclusion P.4.3 Research Formatting Guidelines
P.4.3.2 adhering to publishing guidelines for a research essay P.4.3.3 adhering to an established format for a research essay P.4.3.4 using technology effectively to prepare the essay and to present information NOTE: We have incorporated, when appropriate, examples from the College Board Standards for College Success, published in 2006, to elaborate and exemplify the content of the backmapped benchmarks. These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. P.4.1 Research Essay: Topics, Development and Focus
P.4.1.1.4-8.b Take and organize notes on what is known and what needs to be researched about the topic. (ADP D1) P.4.1.1.4-5.c Focus on concrete, factual information. (ADP D1) P.4.1.2.4-5.a Use sources which are provided or suggested and locate additional sources that are relevant to the topic. (ADP D2 and ADP D5) P.4.1.2.4-5.b Identify elements of print and electronic resources that make them reliable and/or credible resources. (ADP D2 and ADP D5) P.4.1.2.4-5.c Identify features that indicate if Web sites are reliable or unreliable. (ADP D2 and ADP D5) P.4.1.2.4-8.d Identify the characteristics and limitations of source material. (ADP D2 and ADP D5) P.4.1.3.4-5 Use information from at least two different resources. For example, use resources such as those referenced by the College Board: student-generated data, such as interviews, observations and surveys; classroom speakers; field trips; Internet sources; encyclopedias; almanacs. (ADP F7) P.4.1.4.4-5.a Provide relevant research information to adequately develop and support a relatively straightforward topic. (ADP D5) P.4.1.4.4-5.b Interpret data in one format on a familiar topic. For example, interpret a bar graph based on the number of male and female students in the school. (ADP D5) P.4.1.4.4-5.c Marshal evidence in basic ways. For example, marshal evidence in ways such as those referenced by the College Board: gathering examples and facts; defining key terms; comparing and reporting what others have said about the topic. (ADP D5) P.4.1.5.4-5 Summarize research information in own words. (ADP D5) P.4.2 Research Essay: Coherence and Cohesion
P.4.2.2.4-5.a Present a body of facts and information. (ADP C3) P.4.2.2.4-5.b Connect relatively uncomplicated ideas using relatively simple transitions. (ADP C3) P.4.2.2.4-5.c Create an effective organizing structure based on relatively uncomplicated research information (e.g., description, problem-solution, question-answer). (ADP C3) P.4.2.3.4-5 Craft a clear ending sentence or paragraph in which closure is provided, such as by restating the topic and summarizing information. (ADP C3) P.4.3 Research Formatting Guidelines
P.4.3.1.4-5.b Use correct punctuation when quoting. (ADP C6 and ADP D5) P.4.3.2.4-12 Report findings within prescribed time and/or length requirements, as appropriate. (ADP D4) P.4.3.3.4-5 Format text and graphics (using technology as appropriate), including: P.4.3.4.4-5 Use simple graphics and illustrative material effectively to support research ideas in the text as appropriate. (ADP C7) PRODUCT 5: WORK-RELATED TEXTS (P.5) As students progress across the grade levels, they should develop increasingly sophisticated work-related texts, which would include, for example, such documents as memos, e-mails, correspondence, project plans, work orders, proposals, resumes, bios, abstracts, Web pages or talking points. The Writing strand describes development of general writing skills and abilities; please use this strand in connection with those below. Also, please note that while the benchmarks below are specific to writing, students can also convey work-related information via Speaking or Producing Digital Media; the benchmark criteria below can be modified accordingly. The benchmarks for effective work-related texts progress across grades 4 – 5 in the following areas: P.5.1 Topics, Development and Focus
P.5.1.2 aligning the medium or format with the purpose for writing P.5.1.3 using different strategies to achieve the purpose for writing P.5.1.4 addressing audience needs P.5.1.5 anticipating potential problems or misunderstandings P.5.1.6 using accessible language P.5.1.7 providing sufficient explanation and support P.5.2 Coherence and Cohesion
P.5.3 Technical Facility and Control
These benchmarks are described in greater detail below. P.5.1 Work-Related Texts: Topics, Development and Focus
P.5.1.2.4-12 Select a medium or format appropriate to purpose for writing, and maintain focus on the purpose. For example, write to inform, to persuade, to explain or clarify, to solve a problem or to instruct. (ADP C10) P.5.1.3.4-8 Use some varied strategies to achieve different purposes. For example, providing facts and details or including examples to illustrate. (ADP C10) P.5.1.4.4-5 Demonstrate awareness of audience through selection of medium or format, choice of supporting ideas, and word choice and tone. For example, use informal language in a letter to a parent, and more formal language in one to a teacher. (ADP C10) P.5.1.5.4-8 Respond to opposing viewpoints and/or anticipate and answer potential questions from audience. (ADP C10) P.5.1.6.4-8 Use accurate and accessible vocabulary to convey meaning. (ADP C10) P.5.1.7.4-8 Provide accurate and relevant support for the main points in the text. (ADP C10) P.5.2 Work-Related Texts: Coherence and Cohesion
P.5.3 Work-Related Texts: Technical Facility and Control
P.5.3.1.4-5.b Use relatively uncomplicated techniques to format the text for reading efficiency and clarity. For example, format by numbering steps in a set of directions or using headers for different sections. (ADP C10) P.5.3.1.4-8.c Include formatting or visual elements to guide readers by highlighting specific categories of information and/or to signal transitions between steps (such as headings or bulleted lists). (ADP C10) P.5.3.1.4-5.d Use some relatively simple graphics and illustrative material to support ideas in the text as appropriate to content and medium. For example, create a hand-made chart or graph. (ADP C10) |
|
Work in Teams (W) WORK TEAMS AND GROUP DISCUSSION (W.1) As students progress across the grade levels, they should both develop their s |