|
Commentary:
Adding Rigor to the Pell Grant
Starting this fall, low-income students who have taken a rigorous curriculum in high school may receive an increase in annual Pell grant funding of $750 to $1,300 for each of the first two years of college, under the newly enacted Academic Competitiveness Grants (ACGs) program.
The underlying principle of the ACGs is sound: Provide low-income college-bound students with incentives to take a curriculum that will prepare them for success once they get there, thereby increasing the odds that those students will persist and earn a college degree. Economically disadvantaged students are far less likely to have access to a rigorous high school curriculum. This grants program has the potential to help turn that situation around and, as a result, increase college enrollment and success among the most underrepresented groups in our nation.
Here’s the rub. The law does not define which courses students need to take to be eligible for the grants; that was left to each state, subject to approval by the secretary of education. Because the first grants will be awarded to students enrolled in college this fall, states will need to define their courses of study by June.
The research on what constitutes a rigorous course of study is pretty clear. Those who take math beyond Algebra II, for example, are at least 50 percent more likely to earn a bachelor’s degree than those who stop at Algebra II, nearly four times more likely than those who stop at Geometry and nearly nine times more likely than those who stop at Algebra I. A rigorous high school curriculum is a particularly important equalizer for low-income and minority students -- it can cut the college completion gap between white and minority students in half.
State education agencies that are tasked with defining a rigorous curriculum will have to make a choice: Define rigorous based on the best available research and, as a result, limit the number of Pell-eligible students who will receive the additional financial aid this fall, or distribute the funds more broadly by low-balling the definition of a rigorous curriculum.
The U.S. Department of Education issued guidance to states last week, which frames a clear set of options for defining a rigorous course of study. The options are sensible and largely reflect the latest research on the skills students need to be successful in college, yet they leave each state the flexibility to define rigor for itself, which may lead some to aim lower.
We encourage states to use one of the options spelled out by the Education Department rather than proposing a less rigorous standard. For states that already have defined a college-prep course of study, either by making it the default curriculum for high school graduation or by defining an advanced or honors diploma, they should use that curriculum as the target for the ACGs. For states that have not yet defined a rigorous college-prep course of study, this is the opportunity to do so.
If states succumb to the temptation to maximize the number of their students who can receive the additional funds by setting the bar low, they will once again sell low-income students short by subjecting them to “the soft bigotry of low expectations.” Their reward will be additional financial aid but with the same high odds of needing to take remedial courses and the same extremely low odds of completing a college degree.
College readiness means more than simply getting in the door of a postsecondary institution. It means being adequately prepared to succeed once you get there.
Read more about the Academic Competitiveness Grants (summary • fact sheet).
|