| |
Commentary:
Rolling Up Their Sleeves
During the recent inaugural meeting of the American Diploma Project (ADP) Network, representatives from 18 states spent two days discussing how to strengthen American high schools. The focus was on dialogue, problem solving and priority setting.
The sessions were short on show-and-tell and long on the nitty-gritty of action planning, with representatives from all the right sectors -- governors, chief state school officers, business groups, higher education institutions, K-12 educators and state board members -- discussing changes in policy and practice that will ensure that all students graduate high school ready for college, work, the military or other postsecondary endeavors.
In state teams and across states, the groups zeroed in on a series of challenges that must be addressed. For instance, how can we better clarify workplace and college expectations? Are they the same in Ohio as they are in Oregon or Oklahoma? Are the skills needed for work really the same as those needed for college, as the 2003 ADP report suggests? If so, how do we make a better case to the public, which remains skeptical about the skills convergence?
How can states build tests of college and work readiness into their high school assessment systems? Should states add a college component to their existing high school tests, as California has done in partnership with California State University? Should they develop end-of-course tests in each subject or a single test covering all of them? Can current college tests, such as the ACT or SAT, be modified to double as high school exams? Should states pool their resources to develop higher-quality assessments than they can on their own?
If we raise graduation requirements, how do we simultaneously guard against higher dropout rates? Among the priority challenges: What can be done to improve teacher quality, support struggling students and low-performing schools, and strengthen the pipeline starting in elementary school? Representatives from the three states that already have adopted ADP-level course requirements -- Arkansas, Indiana and Texas -- shared what they have done and the many implementation challenges that remain.
These are difficult questions that cannot be answered overnight. Yet the states also bring a keen sense of urgency to this work. By this fall, each state will release publicly its detailed action plan for addressing the ADP priorities. Their willingness to make such shared, public commitments represents a very important milestone ... and bodes well for the ultimate success and staying power of these state teams and our national coalition.
The real beneficiaries will be high school students who say they are not being challenged enough, parents who worry that their children will not go to college or get a good job, employers and college faculty who bemoan the low skill levels of recent high school graduates, and political leaders who are concerned about their states' ability to retain and attract high-quality jobs in a hypercompetitive global economy.
|
|
|
|
News Clips
Click on the links below to view
articles of interest from the past month. Some
publications require free registration to read
articles.
-
Raising expectations in math and English. Georgia state officials, concerned about U.S. students' performance on international math assessments, recently approved an integrated math curriculum based on a Japanese model that weaves together algebra, geometry and statistics. Meanwhile, Oregon lawmakers are expected to ratchet up graduation requirements to include four years of English and three years of math. As we noted in last month's issue, this is a move in the right direction. Next, the state will need to go beyond the number of courses students must take to specify the core knowledge and skills students need to learn in those courses to be ready for college or the world of work.
-
Holding the line on exit exams. An editorial in The Mercury News encourages California not to relax or delay the exit exam requirements, citing public opinion research showing that Californians support the exam. Meanwhile, the state board of education in North Carolina has decided to upgrade the rigor of its high school graduation tests, moving from an 8th grade exam to a series of high school end-of-course tests. The state board in Arizona has moved in the opposite direction, lowering the score students need to reach on the state test to graduate.
-
Abbott goes to high school. The New Jersey school reform effort -- the result of Abbott v. Burke -- is being extended to middle and high school. The four low-income districts in the pilot program will personalize students' education experience and increase the rigor of coursework. If successful, the model will be implemented in other high-need districts.
-
Tracking graduation and dropout rates. As states make improving the transition from high school to college a priority, the U.S. Department of Education is considering the creation of a federal database that might make it easier to follow the performance of students from the K-12 system through higher education. The database would include individual records for college students, enabling them to be tracked from state to state and institution to institution. The proposal is raising privacy concerns, but if those concerns are successfully addressed and the database is aligned with the K-12 system, it could provide valuable information on the performance of both high schools and postsecondary institutions.
|
|
|
|